用户讨论:Captainlinux8880
about the screenshot uploads
Hi, greetings.
I noted that you're uploading quite a few screenshots. I would not say that doing so is not proper, but there are a few points that hopefully could be useful for you. Well I do admit there is not any specific guideline for that, I can attempt a rule-by-decree chance tho
- Screenshots without visible changes may not be uploaded in a high volume, it appears to me that those screenshots would not be notable after all;
- There is no real reason for just uploading every SS from the library app, especially those without notable changes. These were done under a different criteria and was rather high in volume, which would, unfortunately, cause a little bit of heavy burden to the server;
- Not sure whether proper to say so, but for those builds that are not *yet* shared publicly (but someone here do have access to), we (or just I) do not consider them as unleaked that require documenting all available screenshots, so just those basic screenshots shall be OK enough. Of course if there're any visible change just ignore what I said above.
SO, just try not to upload too much screenshots that contain no visible change, especially those too generic to even look at (SETUP.exe time). This is just an advice/suggestion, as well as I figured out its not a bad time to make the requirements clearer, this message shall only represent my own ideas though.
Have a good day, regards, --喵喵喵~~ 2023年1月26日 (四) 12:09 (CST)
Hello. Sorry for the long answer. I thought it would be nice to upload images from the BW Library to the Wiki page, because not everyone has access to this application (I don't know, version 12.11 Lite, it seems to be the latest), and it would greatly enhance the page, because most of the pages here they have only one screenshot and a small description. Captainlinux8880（讨论） 2023年1月31日 (二) 22:01 (CST)
- Hi. Those with changes are entirely OK imo, but just those without any visible changes are not so convincing for me. Some builds are just that boring, and it's nevertheless impossible to make the pages full since MS may had changed nothing visible. Thank you. Regards, --喵喵喵~~ 2023年2月3日 (五) 17:18 (CST)
"_"
Display title would be a hard thing to accomplish considering the large volume of pages. I understand it might look more accurate, but since what have been done is impossible to reverse, then just let it go tho. Maybe a better plan would be made in the future, but now let's put this down :) Regards, --喵喵喵~~ 2023年2月3日 (五) 17:22 (CST)
OK! Captainlinux8880（讨论） 2023年2月3日 (五) 19:01 (CST)
naming rules (broken link)
Hello. I noticed a broken link on this page: https://wiki.betaworld.cn/%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A:%E4%B8%8A%E4%BC%A0%E6%96%87%E4%BB%B6 (重要提示:请上传图像文件前详细阅读有关上传图像的命名规则：关于 BetaWorld 百科流媒体命名的相关方案。)
It refers to a closed forum. I think it should be replaced. Regards, Captainlinux8880（讨论） 2023年2月4日 (六) 20:14 (CST)
No need to remove unused parameters
Just leave them there for future use. Th1r5bvn23（讨论） 2023年2月4日 (六) 21:47 (CST)
Ok Captainlinux8880（讨论） 2023年2月4日 (六) 21:50 (CST)
No need to change IA64 to IA-64
It's one of acceptable abbreviation and it won't cause any confusion. There's no need to change that. Th1r5bvn23（留言） 2023年2月9日 (四) 09:47 (CST)
Alright. It's just that the architecture is called IA-64, not IA64 Captainlinux8880（留言） 2023年2月9日 (四) 17:24 (CST)
New versions of the BetaWorld Library application?
Hi all. A small question about the BetaWorld Library application. Is this app closed as well as the forum and download center? Or are there newer versions, with new builds, than version 12.10? Thanks. Regards, Captainlinux8880（留言） 2023年2月10日 (五) 21:46 (CST)
The library app is functionally replaced by this wiki and won't be updated frequently. IMO this wiki provides adequate information so that the library app is not much needed. Th1r5bvn23（留言） 2023年2月10日 (五) 22:44 (CST)
Why moving all the NFOs into template pages alone
I don't understand, what's the reason? --随便问我（留言） 2023年2月17日 (五) 20:41 (CST)
Reducing the volume of pages and creating the NFO as a separate document. In my opinion, the page looks much more compact this way. Captainlinux8880（留言） 2023年2月17日 (五) 21:36 (CST)
This should be discussed with other member before editing, it's not small change. Personally I think the way in BetaWiki usage is annoying, it's not clean to me, but rather make the site structure more complicated. 随便问我（留言） 2023年2月18日 (六) 01:04 (CST)
As I wrote earlier, just undo the changes if you see fit. Captainlinux8880（留言） 2023年2月18日 (六) 01:06 (CST)
I'll not undo since the pages have done already, but I think it's better to be discussed before any further change, as well as reflist you did. :P 随便问我（留言） 2023年2月18日 (六) 01:08 (CST)
有什么关于Build 9388是Fake的直接证据吗？
如题，注意到Build 9388被从Windows 8.1页面移除了，理由是Fake，有什么比较直接的证据能证明这一点吗？--蓝色泪雨（留言） 2023年2月17日 (五) 23:38 (CST)
1. https://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28151
2. https://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28146 Captainlinux8880（留言） 2023年2月17日 (五) 23:40 (CST)